TINLANCE / ENGINEERING EVIDENCE

A public architecture map with a claim-to-evidence boundary.

This is a public abstraction of platform responsibilities and trust boundaries. It is not a production topology, customer environment, or infrastructure disclosure.

01 / ARCHITECTURE MAP

Connected layers.
Explicit boundaries.

The system is intentionally not presented as a single linear runtime. Commercial, delivery, API, security, evaluation, execution, knowledge and productization boundaries interact through defined control relationships.

M1

Commercial Engine

Assessment, lead, qualification, booking, proposal and engagement flow.

Boundary: Public/commercial application

Status: Implemented
M3

Customer Workspace

Tenant-scoped customer delivery and evidence surfaces.

Boundary: Authenticated customer application

Status: Implemented
M4

Automation

Workflow execution and orchestration boundary.

Boundary: Application workflow layer

Status: Implemented
M5

API Platform

Central API surface for platform capabilities and contracts.

Boundary: API/application boundary

Status: Implemented
M6

MCP Gateway

Controlled MCP/tool boundary with authorization-aware execution.

Boundary: Protocol/tool trust boundary

Status: Tested
M7

AI Security Gateway

Identity, tenancy, authorization, policy, risk, approval, output and audit controls.

Boundary: Security/trust plane

Status: Tested
M8

Evaluation Platform

Evaluation and regression authority for AI behavior and release decisions.

Boundary: Evaluation/control plane

Status: Tested
M9

Agent Runtime

Bounded agent execution with identity, approvals and runtime evidence.

Boundary: Execution boundary

Status: Tested
M10

Knowledge / RAG

Knowledge and retrieval authority with explicit scope boundaries.

Boundary: Knowledge/data boundary

Status: Tested
M11

AI Sales Engineer

Grounded technical discovery and product information surface.

Boundary: Public product/discovery application

Status: Implemented
M12

Revenue Intelligence

Commercial and revenue intelligence layer.

Boundary: Internal commercial data layer

Status: Implemented
M13

Proprietary Knowledge Moat

Governed intelligence derived from approved delivery evidence.

Boundary: Private knowledge layer

Status: Implemented
M14

Consulting → Software

Pattern-to-playbook-to-productization feedback loop.

Boundary: Productization strategy/control layer

Status: Implemented

The downward sequence is a reading order, not a claim that every module is a runtime dependency of the next. Cross-links and control relationships are listed below.

02 / CONTROL RELATIONSHIPS

Architecture as evidence.

These relationships describe public responsibility boundaries without exposing private infrastructure.

M1M3

Commercial Engine

Commercial context becomes tenant-scoped delivery context.

M3M5

Customer Workspace

Customer delivery uses the API boundary.

M5M7

API Platform

Sensitive AI capabilities cross the security control plane.

M7M8

AI Security Gateway

Protected execution is evaluated before release/promotion.

M8M9

Evaluation Platform

Evaluation gates agent runtime behavior.

M9M10

Agent Runtime

Agent execution consumes scoped knowledge/retrieval.

M10M11

Knowledge / RAG

Grounded knowledge supports technical discovery.

M11M12

AI Sales Engineer

Commercial discovery can feed governed revenue intelligence.

M12M13

Revenue Intelligence

Approved delivery/commercial evidence informs the private knowledge layer.

M13M14

Proprietary Knowledge Moat

Evidence informs reusable patterns and productization.

M4M5

Automation

Automation operates through the application/API boundary.

M6M7

MCP Gateway

MCP tool access remains subject to security controls.

M5FDE

API Platform

FDE API provides the domain execution boundary.

FDEFDE-MASTERY

FDE

FDE API routes into the domain-oriented FDE platform.

THREATFADEM7

THREATFADE

ThreatFade is a distinct security product and public engineering evidence source; it is not a Tinlance subsystem.

03 / EVIDENCE TAXONOMY

Know what the status means.

Status is not decoration. It describes the strength and scope of evidence behind a claim.

Status: ImplementedExists in the current implementation.
Status: TestedCovered by automated or reproducible tests demonstrating the stated behavior.
Status: ValidatedSupported by documented validation beyond ordinary implementation or unit testing, with scope stated.
Status: ExperimentalImplemented for research or evaluation; production suitability has not been established.
Status: PlannedIntentionally identified for future implementation and not currently implemented.
EVIDENCE TYPE

Source code

A defined evidence source used to scope technical claims.

EVIDENCE TYPE

Automated test

A defined evidence source used to scope technical claims.

EVIDENCE TYPE

E2E test

A defined evidence source used to scope technical claims.

EVIDENCE TYPE

Benchmark

A defined evidence source used to scope technical claims.

EVIDENCE TYPE

Synthetic evaluation

A defined evidence source used to scope technical claims.

EVIDENCE TYPE

Independent validation

A defined evidence source used to scope technical claims.

EVIDENCE TYPE

Production evidence

Reserved for actual production evidence; repository tests alone do not qualify.

EVIDENCE TYPE

Research

A defined evidence source used to scope technical claims.

EVIDENCE TYPE

Documentation

A defined evidence source used to scope technical claims.

EVIDENCE TYPE

Architecture

A defined evidence source used to scope technical claims.

EVIDENCE TYPE

Security verification

A defined evidence source used to scope technical claims.

04 / PUBLIC REPOSITORIES

Inspect the implementation.

Only public repositories are linked. Private platform repositories and internal implementation details are intentionally excluded.

ENGINEERING → ASSESSMENT

Public architecture meets the real environment.

Use a technical assessment to establish environment-specific workflow, architecture, security constraints, evidence and outcomes.

Start a technical assessment